The Apryse Fall 2026 Release is Here: Explore What's New

DOCX Editor Comparison

Apryse DOCX Editor vs OnlyOffice: Feature-Level Comparison

Apryse DOCX Editor and OnlyOffice Docs both edit DOCX files natively using OOXML. The difference is architecture and compliance. Apryse runs entirely in the browser using WebAssembly, with no data stored or processed on a server. OnlyOffice, on the other hand, requires a Document Server, deployed through Docker or Kubernetes, that processes every keystroke server-side. That architecture choice sets your infrastructure burden, your data residency model, your licensing obligations, and your scaling costs.

What Apryse and OnlyOffice Have in Common

Both of these products edit DOCX files as native OOXML rather than converting through an intermediate JSON or HTML format. Compared to other options available to developers, this distinction massively improves accuracy and fidelity of Word documents loaded in your app.

Editors that round-trip through JSON or HTML can lose headers, footers, pagination, and tracked-changes data on export. Apryse and OnlyOffice both write OOXML directly, so formatting survives when the file reopens elsewhere. Track changes are a second point of parity. Apryse and OnlyOffice both produce OOXML w:ins and w:del markup that Microsoft Word reads correctly, along with headers, footers, and comments.

See the full DOCX Editor comparison for how Apryse stacks up against other embeddable editors in addition to OnlyOffice.

Architecture Differences: Client-Side vs. Document Server

Copied to clipboard

Apryse's DOCX Editor runs on WebViewer's C++ core, compiled to WebAssembly to run in your JavaScript application. Every edit, from a keystroke to a tracked-changes accept, executes in the browser. No document content is transmitted, stored or processed anywhere. With client-side processing, loading and processing documents relies on the computing resources of each client device.

OnlyOffice takes the opposite approach. OnlyOffice Docs is the editing component, but it cannot render or edit a document without OnlyOffice Document Server, a separate backend you deploy through Docker or Kubernetes. Every keystroke is sent to that server, processed, and the result streamed back to the browser. The processing relies on massive server-side computing resources, which can be a benefit, but can also introduce latency and costs.

This is the core tradeoff behind the whole comparison. Read the native OOXML architecture page for the deeper technical explanation of why client-side OOXML editing avoids the round-trip problem entirely.

Setup: Apryse WebViewer (No Server)

Copied to clipboard

The DOCX Editor add-on to WebViewer requires no backend deployment. The constructor mounts the editor to a DOM element and starts editing once the license and static assets are in place.

Setup: OnlyOffice Document Server

Copied to clipboard

OnlyOffice requires the Document Server running before any client-side code can connect to it. The pattern below reflects OnlyOffice's publicly documented Docker deployment and editor initialization. Confirm exact configuration options against OnlyOffice's current API documentation before use.

Once the Document Server container is running and reachable, initialize the editor from the client.

Feature Comparison Table

Feature Comparison Table

The table below compares the two approaches capability by capability. For the programmatic side of track changes, see the track changes API.

Apryse DOCX Editor
OnlyOffice Docs

Editing format

Supported

Native OOXML, client-side (WASM)

Supported

Native OOXML, server-side

Client-side capable

Supported

Yes, fully client-side

Not supported

No. Requires OnlyOffice Document Server

Server required

Supported

No

Not supported

Yes. Document Server on Docker or Kubernetes

Programmatic API

Supported

Partial as of this writing. TrackedChangeManager, search and replace, and text insertion/deletion through the Core namespace.

Supported

Yes. Full Document Builder and Automation API

Real-time co-editing

Not supported

Not currently supported. Track changes support sequential, async review

Supported

Yes. Operational-transform engine on Document Server merges simultaneous edits

Track changes

Supported

Yes. OOXML w:ins/w:del, Word-correct. Programmatic accept and reject through TrackedChangeManager

Supported

Yes. Word-correct track changes

Headers/footers

Supported

First-page, odd/even, per-section

Supported

First-page, odd/even, per-section

Comments

Supported

Word-compatible comments

Supported

OOXML-based comments, inline with threads

Pagination

Supported

Preserves pagination and page breaks on reopen in Word. Page number fields are not yet supported

Supported

Full pagination fidelity, including page number fields

Search/replace

Supported

Yes. UI panel and programmatic API

Supported

Yes

Create new DOCX

Supported

Yes, from blank or from an existing file

Supported

Yes

Security certifications

Supported

SOC 2 Type 2 (since 2023), ISO 27001 (since 2018)

Not supported

Not certified for SOC 2 or ISO 27001. Maintains a public bug bounty program rather than published penetration-test results

Accessibility (WCAG 2.2 AA)

Supported

Compliant. Applies to the DOCX Editor UI

Not supported

No formal WCAG claim

HIPAA

Supported

Supported by not touching client data. Documents stay client-side, on-premise

Supported

Supported via self-hosted deployment and your own internal data practices

GDPR

Supported

Compliant

Supported

Compliant

Infrastructure required

Supported

None. Runs in the browser

Not supported

Document Server: Docker or Kubernetes deployment, ongoing operations and scaling

Data residency model

Supported

Documents never leave the browser. No document content crosses the network

Not supported

Documents are processed on the Document Server you deploy. Every keystroke crosses the network to that server

Supply chain transparency

Supported

Source-available WebViewer UI. Single vendor accountable for the code

Not supported

A 2026 Cybernews analysis found approximately 90% of commits in the Euro-Office fork, which inherited OnlyOffice's codebase, timestamped to Moscow time

Ecosystem stability

Supported

Single vendor across viewing, DOCX, and spreadsheet editing, no third-party integration dependency for core editing

Not supported

Nextcloud integration partnership ended June 2026; Nextcloud, IONOS, and Proton forked their own Euro-Office alternative

Licensing: Commercial vs AGPL

Apryse licenses the DOCX Editor commercially, with flat pricing and one license key covering the add-on's full feature set. There is no per-page or per-token fee, and no separate SKU for a bigger deployment.

OnlyOffice ships two licensing paths. The Community Edition is free under AGPLv3, but AGPLv3's network-use clause requires you to disclose the source code of any SaaS product that embeds it, including your own application code, if users interact with it over a network. Teams that cannot make their own source public typically move to the commercial Developer or Enterprise Edition instead, which carries its own separate pricing and sales process.

Collaboration and Co-Editing

Copied to clipboard

The Apryse DOCX Editor does not currently offer real-time co-editing. Apryse supports comment-based and track-changes-based collaboration instead: reviewers leave comments, propose edits as tracked changes, and accept or reject them, working sequentially rather than simultaneously. For workflows built around structured review and approval, sequential review with a full audit trail through tracked changes meets users' needs.

Security and Data Residency

Copied to clipboard

Apryse's DOCX Editor keeps documents in the browser for the entire editing session. No document content crosses the network to Apryse or to any third party. Read the secure client-side editing page for the full architecture. Apryse holds SOC 2 (since 2023) and ISO 27001 (since 2018).

OnlyOffice's self-hosted Document Server keeps documents on infrastructure you control, which addresses data residency at the deployment level. But every keystroke still crosses the network from the browser to that server for processing, and OnlyOffice does not publicly document a SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certification for the Document Server, or make a formal WCAG accessibility claim. OnlyOffice maintains a public bug bounty program rather than publishing independent penetration-test results.

A 2026 Cybernews supply-chain analysis found that approximately 90 percent of commits in the Euro-Office codebase, the Nextcloud, IONOS, and Proton fork that inherited OnlyOffice's code, carry a Moscow-timezone timestamp, a data point some procurement teams weigh alongside the architecture question.

OnlyOffice's Nextcloud integration partnership also ended in June 2026, when Nextcloud, IONOS, and Proton forked their own Euro-Office alternative rather than continuing to build on OnlyOffice, a data point worth factoring into any long-term ecosystem dependency.

Infrastructure and Scaling

Copied to clipboard

Apryse's DOCX Editor needs no server infrastructure at all. It scales the way any static browser asset scales: through a CDN, with no document server to provision, patch, or monitor.

OnlyOffice's Document Server is a stateful backend service. Scaling it to more concurrent editors means running more Document Server instances, load-balancing between them, and keeping a Docker or Kubernetes deployment patched and monitored. That is real operational work your team owns (and pays for) for as long as the product is in production.

When to Choose OnlyOffice

Copied to clipboard

OnlyOffice is currently an option for developers when real-time co-editing is a hard requirement rather than a nice-to-have. It also fits teams already running Docker or Kubernetes in production, where standing up another containerized service adds little incremental operational burden. And it fits the self-hosted, open-source-first community where AGPL obligations are already an accepted part of the stack.

When to Choose Apryse

Copied to clipboard

Apryse is the stronger choice when your product cannot run additional backend infrastructure, or when you would rather not own it. The DOCX Editor runs entirely client-side, which keeps documents off the network by default and removes the Document Server from your infrastructure and your GDPR data-residency conversation. It also fits teams that need a flat, predictable commercial license rather than navigating AGPL source-disclosure obligations inside a commercial SaaS product, and regulated industries where SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certifications are part of the vendor evaluation.

Explore the DOCX Editor

See the full DOCX Editor capability page.

Frequently Asked Questions

No. OnlyOffice Docs requires a running Document Server, deployed through Docker, Kubernetes, or a manual Linux or Windows install. There is no client-only deployment path.

The Community Edition is free under AGPLv3, but AGPLv3 requires you to disclose the source code of any SaaS product that embeds it. The Developer and Enterprise Editions carry a separate commercial license and separate pricing. In addition, by using OnlyOffice, you incur separate costs associated with running your server backend.

Not currently. The DOCX Editor supports comment and track-changes-based collaboration: reviewers work sequentially and changes are tracked, accepted, or rejected, rather than multiple users editing the same document at the same time.

Both products can be deployed in a way that supports GDPR compliance. However, Apryse's DOCX Editor never transmits document content over a network, which removes a data-transfer question from your compliance review entirely. OnlyOffice's self-hosted Document Server keeps data on infrastructure you control, but every keystroke still crosses your network to reach it, which puts more of the compliance burden on how you configure and secure that deployment.

Yes, but the AGPLv3 Community Edition requires you to disclose your product's source code if you offer it as a network service. Most commercial SaaS products embedding OnlyOffice license the Developer or Enterprise Edition instead, at separate cost.